Artificial Intelligence as a Factor in the Sociodynamics of Daily Order | Научно-инновационный портал СФУ

Artificial Intelligence as a Factor in the Sociodynamics of Daily Order

Тип публикации: доклад, тезисы доклада, статья из сборника материалов конференций

Конференция: Telegram Conference on Future Professions in the Digital Economy: Development Prospects and Social Consequence, 2020

Год издания: 2021

Идентификатор DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_38

Ключевые слова: artificial intelligence, autopoiesis, ethoses

Аннотация: Artificial intelligence is defined by researchers as a component of social and cultural dynamics of daily order. The analysis of available research has shown that the study of the influence of artificial intelligence on society and man is dominated by approaches that seem insufficient and one-sided, especially in the interpretation of its impact on social and cultural processes, daily order. According to the authors, these approaches are based mainly on the principles of technicism, the essence of which is the consideration of artificial intelligence as emancipated from the human mind, from the everyday order and culture of the subject. There is a proprietary approach to the study of artificial intelligence, its social and humanitarian component in the article. A number of opportunities for the effective use of artificial intelligence in solving social and humanitarian problems, including it in the processes of social dynamics of daily order are offered. These possibilities are connected with interaction, mutual complementing (N. Bohr’s complementarity principle) of artificial intellect with culture: the sphere in which a personality is formed that is responsible to society and to itself. It is proven that the sociodynamics of the everyday order, effective ways of social reproduction (autopoiesis) are possible only on the basis of dialogue, mutual complementing (N. Bohr’s complementarity principle) of cultural resources (as a sphere “responsible” for the development of personality) and actually the resources of artificial intelligence. The absence of dialogue leads to the loss of artificial intelligence from the social autopoiesis. Artificial intelligence does not execute the function assigned to it: the constructs of social networks that ensure the reproduction of people as social actors. The problem with artificial intelligence is not that robots and machines take over the human world, but that people themselves give up the role of the actors of their own being voluntarily, entrusting this role to artificial intelligence (robots, machines, Internet options and applications). © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Ссылки на полный текст

Издание

Журнал: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

Выпуск журнала: Vol. 198

Номера страниц: 330-337

ISSN журнала: 23673370

Издатель: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH

Персоны

  • Andreeva A.V. (Siberian Federal Institute, Department of Advertising and Social and Cultural Activities, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)
  • Gritskov Y.V. (Siberian Federal Institute, Department of Philosophy, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)
  • Pavlov A.P. (Siberian Federal Institute, Department of Sociology, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)
  • Fenvesh T.A. (Siberian Federal Institute, Department of Sociology, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)

Вхождение в базы данных

Информация о публикациях загружается с сайта службы поддержки публикационной активности СФУ. Сообщите, если заметили неточности.

Вы можете отметить интересные фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.