Сибирский федеральный университет

Тип публикации: статья из журнала

Год издания: 2014

Идентификатор DOI: 10.1007/s11055-014-9978-2

Ключевые слова: analytical vs. synthetic, field independence vs. field dependence, flexible vs. rigid cognitive control, local vs. global image analysis, Ponzo illusion, segment size, accuracy, adolescent, adult, analyticality cognitive style, article, brain function, cognitve style parameters, controlled study, executive function, experimental test, female, field dependence cognitive style, field independence cognitive style, flexible cognitive style, functional assessment, human, human experiment, image analysis, male, medical parameters, nervous system parameters, normal human, perceptive discrimination, rigid cognitive control, syntheticatility cogntive style

Аннотация: The effectiveness of the discrimination of segment sizes by people with different cognitive style parameters - field dependence vs. field independence, analytical vs. synthetic, and flexible vs. rigid cognitive control - was studied. Discrimination effectiveness was assessed in terms of the magnitude of the Ponzo illusion. The magnitude of the Ponzo illusion was found to be significantly smaller in subjects with a field-independent cognitive style than in those with a field-dependent style. People with the flexible type of cognitive control demonstrated a tendency to more accurate perception of segment size in the Ponzo figure than those with rigid control. There was no relationship between the analytical-synthetic style of categorization and the magnitude of the Ponzo illusion. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media.

Журнал: Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

Выпуск журнала: Vol. 44, Is. 7

Номера страниц: 748-753

• Shoshina I.I. (Siberian Federal University)
• Shelepin Y.E. (I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology)

• Scopus
• Ядро РИНЦ (eLIBRARY.RU)
• Список ВАК