Сибирский федеральный университет

Тип публикации: статья из журнала

Год издания: 2016

Идентификатор DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/754/6/062002

Ключевые слова: Combustion, Fluid dynamics, Hydrodynamics, Numerical methods, Turbulence models, Comparative studies, Computational studies, Detailed kinetics, Eddy dissipation concept, Probability density function (pdf), RANS turbulence models, Reaction mechanism, Turbulent combustion, Probability density function

Аннотация: Several popular turbulent combustion models have been tested in a computational study of three experimentally well-documented non-swirling and swirling jet flames. Different combinations of turbulence, combustion and reaction mechanisms models were considered. It is shown that the eddy- dissipation concept (EDC) and the probability-density function (PDF) of flamelet combustion models with detailed kinetics mechanisms provide the best results for all flames examined. For some cases, a combination of RANS turbulence models and less costly combustion approaches (Hybrid or EDC with 4 reactions) also gives acceptable results. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Журнал: All-Russian Conference with the School for Young Scientists Thermophysics and Physical Hydrodynamics 2016, TPH 2016 (19 September 2016 through 25 September 2016

Выпуск журнала: Vol. 754, Is. 6

• Dekterev A.A. (Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)
• Dekterev A.A. (Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
• Minakov A.V. (Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation)

• Scopus
• Ядро РИНЦ (eLIBRARY.RU)