Сибирский федеральный университет

Тип публикации: статья из журнала

Год издания: 2020

Идентификатор DOI: 10.25205/2410-7883-2020-2-371-384

Ключевые слова: I. A. Bunin, A. K. Tolstoy, philosophy of history, memory, genre, ballad, anniversary article, И. А. Бунин, А. К. Толстой, историософия, память, жанр, баллада, юбилейная статья

Аннотация: Рассматривается восприятие И. А. Буниным личности и произведений А. К. Толстого. Ключевыми слагаемыми рецепции становятся система сформированных А. К. Толстым историософских воззрений и концепция исторической памяти. Принадлежность поэта и романиста XIX в. мифологизированному Буниным роду Толстых выделена как повод для рефлексии и определения младшим писателем собственного положения относительно каждого из трех литераторов - Л. Н. Толстого, А. К. Толстого и бунинского современника А. Н. Толстого. В качестве материала привлечены художественные произведения, публицистика и эго-документы И. А. Бунина и А. К. Толстого. The article deals with I. A. Bunin’s perception of the personality and works by A. K. Tolstoy. The key components of this reception are the system of philosophy of history views formulated by A. K. Tolstoy and his concept of historical memory. The belonging of the 19th century poet to the large Tolstoy family was mythologized by Bunin and became a reason for understanding and determining the young writer’s own position in relation to each of the three writers: L. N. Tolstoy, A. K. Tolstoy and Bunin’s contemporary A. N. Tolstoy. The paper draws upon fictional and nonfictional documents by I. A. Bunin and A. K. Tolstoy. Bunin’s reception of the personality and artistic heritage by A. K. Tolstoy was determined by the history of his origin. The Tolstoy family attracted Bunin’s attention because it was an illustration of his own concept of the literary gift as a “family affair”. Leo Tolstoy enjoyed an undisputed genius and generally recognized family reputation. Aleksey N. Tolstoy’s biography, on the contrary, was ambiguous - the fact that inspired Bunin’s scandalous hints in his essay “The Third Tolstoy”. Aleksey K. Tolstoy’s biographical path of was also surrounded by similar rumors - but Bunin in his article “Inonia and Kitezh” prefers to keep silent on them. In the 1900s, A. K. Tolstoy appeared to Bunin as a rival poet, and in the eyes of Bunin’s contemporaries as the one of his main literary predecessors. Bunin’s poem “Kurgan” was a kind of poetic response to A. K. Tolstoy’s ballad “Kurgan” dedicated to the problem of historical oblivion. These works-doublets could serve as an illustration of one of the types of literary “revision” introduced by H. Bloom. Bunin developed the plot of A. K. Tolstoy’s “Kurgan” in the elegiac genre and demonstrated the value of the past in the present. Since 1918, Bunin’s perception of Tolstoy’s legacy has changed. A. K. Tolstoy’s views of the Russian history are publicly emphasized in the “Cursed Days”, “Mission of the Russian Emigration” and “Inonia and Kitezh”. According to A. K. Tolstoy, the historical catastrophe for Russia was programmed by “Tatar yoke”, which distorted the European character of the national culture and personality and later drove the nation to the particularly Asian, as Tolstoy thought, phenomenon of Ivan the Terrible. Borrowing some modern ideas from the natural sciences, Bunin transferred a number of A. K. Tolstoy’s observations into an anthropological sphere and pointed out specific signs of the “Mongolian” traces in Bolsheviks’ Russia.

Журнал: Сюжетология и сюжетография

Выпуск журнала: № 2

Номера страниц: 371-384

ISSN журнала: 24107883

Место издания: Новосибирск

Издатель: Институт филологии СО РАН

• Анисимова Е.Е. (Сибирский федеральный университет)

• РИНЦ (eLIBRARY.RU)